Friday, August 27, 2010

Ki Tavo reflections, hearkening, spiritually mature covenant,

on the occasion of the 12th anniversary of my bar mitzvah, some thoughts:


והיה אם שמוע תשמע בקול יקוק אליקוך לשמור לעשתו את כל מצותיו אשר אנוכי מצוך היום––ונתנך יקוק אלוקיך עליון
על כל גויי הארץ
we have to listen to the voice of Hashem, not just do things as is so easy to get caught up in our world, we have to obey in the classic sense of the word, of listening, of ‘hearkening in the direction of.’ It’s not enough to just follow something else, but we’re supposed to be in relation to El Chai v’kayyam, to a living God, and if we tune in, we can on a moment-to-moment basis, ie this day, not that bygone day, also experience something of the Divine, we can pull back the curtain from our existence, where the reality of the Divine is usually camouflaged by the dullness of the ordinary and the voice of the Divine is drowned out by the busyness of life and the constant distractions and entertainment and pursuit, the marathon on the hedonic treadmill. And so we have to take care first to hearken and to listen, and then also to do, not just to profess belief as so many ‘religious’ people or ‘believers’ do, but to see our action rather than thoughts as what our belief really is, getting down to the real beliefs, the ones in our subconscious that actually set our agenda/drive our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. I think this is one reason I’m so interested in pursuing contemplative practice. In the path of meditation, we open and tune in to this domain so we can really examine what’s there.
Rebbe Nachman, the 18th century Hasidic master, talks in one of his Torahs (teachings) about teshuva, the theme of Elul and our current time in the Jewish year. He begins by comparing two dialectical motivations that drive our behavior, goals, actions, and ways of relating. The first he calls ‘kavod melachim,’ or the honor of kings. Kavod melachim, Rebbe Nachman explains, is the pursuit of social regard, to be seen in a certain way by others for the sake of one’s own gain, advance, or aggrandizement, to have status and be thought of as______ (fill in the blank for your most coveted way of being seen). R’ Nachman points out that when we pursue kavod melachim we often encounter a path full of obstacles, with others quick to question us and investigate our motives and be in general rather uncooperative, I believe because they sense, perhaps in an unconscious way, that there is an implicit competitiveness and threat in the vying for a scarcity of social capital, not unlike opposing kings who sense that ‘there ain’t room enough for the both of us.’
The second motivation, in stark contrast to the first, is called ‘kavod Elokim,’ the honor of God. One who pursues kavod Elokim is moved by a mission and a force greater than herself. She isn’t out to ‘win shamayim (heaven) points’ or be promoted to partner or garner awards or go down in history as a somebody, but rather senses that there is something she’s being called for, something calling her which in its fullest manifestation is a whole way of being absent of ego, of thoughts or acts of hate, jealousy, greed, arrogance. One who is (or when one is) pursuing kavod Elokim, Rebbe Nachman asserts--and you’re free to reflect on your own experience--finds that people are very willing and happy to help her, that they are cooperative rather than suspicious, perhaps touched by the invisible grace of sincerity, integrity, authenticity, of the conviction and dedication of ovdei Hashem, servants of God.
Our ability to do this full teshuva, R’ Nachman explains, is confounded by our emotional imbalance. When we get angry or live/respond reactively (as opposed to deliberately), even when we’re ‘quite justified’ by most standards, the effect is the obscuring of the Divine in front of us, the crippling of our ability to feel and act towards ourselves and others graciously and with kindness, compassion, and openness. So he explains that our challenge is to cultivate a stillness, so that when our buttons are pushed, the ones that normally cause us to explode (or implode), to lose it, in the face of those very frustrations and wrong treatment we have to be still, hold the openness of perspective and not let those stimuli overtake our entire awareness. We can notice but hold our ground(edness). Ironically perhaps, in the case of our mental reckoning with these events, it is the path of attentiveness and minimal engagement which best keeps us free and tuned in.

We sing in our liturgy from Psalms that בתוך ענן ידבר אליהם, that God speaks to us from within a cloud. When we learn to cultivate stillness and peace, then we allow ourselves the possibility of getting in touch with that really deep impulse available to each of us, the force which is the Divine attempting to insinuate Its way into our consciousness and flood our lives, as our parsha says in great detail, with abundant blessings, that God will open the treasure of the heavens before us.

יפתח ה’ לך את אוצרו הטוב את השמים לתת מטר ארצך בעתו ולברך את כל מעשה ידך והלוית גוים רבים
ואתה לא תלוה.
Finally I’ll add, these are not ideas which you have to accept from me as such. I find it fascinating that at the end of our parsha, the most conspicuously Godly part of our narrative- that of the signs and wonders that God wrought with Pharaoh in Mitzrayim, are actually downplayed. Moshe says, you saw all those great wonders, and yet, not until today
ולא נתן יקוק לכם לב לדעת ועינים לראות ואזנים לשמוע עד היום הזה,
did God give you the heart to know, the eyes to see, and the ears to hear, until this day, a time only after
ואולך אתכם ארבעים שנה במדבר לא בלו שלמותיכם מעליכם ונעלך לבלתה מעל רגלך
Moshe had led the people forty years in the desert and yet their clothes had not worn out, nor their shoes gone hard on them. He points out also that this is a different covenant than that of Horev (Sinai). I think the point here is that of a different covenantal and relational paradigm for a mature spirituality. This is not just ‘take me at my word,’ but rather, see now, pay attention to your experience and see with your very own eyes what is of lasting value and virtue, and what provides only ephemeral or illusory benefit. See, now that you have lived a little bit, perhaps that those popular and successful types who were running about after kavod melachim some years down the road don’t usually end up so happy or fulfilled, lives and relationships falling apart; often we can get so alienated and distant from our essential selves and God that, though we sense something lacking, we try even harder for the only thing we know, kavod melachim, yet like drinking salt water, we find ourselves even further lost. And see now the alternative, the humble ones, or the times we acted for kavod Elokim, purely for a greater Goodness or Godliness. In the covenant of the spiritually mature we can see for ourselves the glory and blessing of hearkening to the call of the Divine. Teshuva, R’ Nachman says, means being ready to become. In this season of teshuva, let us all be open, let us grow and return from our ego trips and self-righteousness and come back eagerly and wholeheartedly to the more subtle and more fulfilling pursuit of kevod Elokim.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Esther, how revealing...

As I was sitting in megillah reading this evening, one line really jumped out at me (like off the page and into my face). For those familiar with the Lauffers' tune, pleease sing it loud enough so the rest can hear. We're at the point where Haman (louder) has just been invited to an exclusive party with the king and queen. Quite pleased with himself he's heading home when he sees Mordechai sitting by the gate of the king's palace, and he (Haman) fills with rage, because Mordechai won't acknowledge him in submission. So he goes home and summons his family to tell them how great, rich, and powerful he is, and then this line,
וְכָל-זֶה, אֵינֶנּוּ שֹׁוֶה לִי: בְּכָל-עֵת, אֲשֶׁר אֲנִי רֹאֶה אֶת-מָרְדֳּכַי הַיְּהוּדִי--יוֹשֵׁב, בְּשַׁעַר הַמֶּלֶךְ.
And all this, it's all worthless to me so long as I see the Jew, Mordechai, sitting at the gate of the king!
This is the part that fascinates me. You were just bragging about all the stuff that you had, right? you can do practically whatever you want, you have the king's signet, you have all the power and money and a big family, and you're upset because some Jew is sitting by the gate???

Haman's vitriol, I think, is unfortunately all too familiar. Anyone who has been angry or irritable, or by the same token, happy or joyful, knows that our mood affects the way we interpret and experience our environment and our interactions, which is why somebody who's upset may very readily violently kick or lash out at whatever object is in his path. Haman, filled with vitriol, takes this to the extreme. But what is the origin of this deep-seated hatred?

The sages of the Talmud ask a helpful question. They inquire: 'Haman min haTorah minayin?' (Where can Haman be found in the Torah?) and answer 'ha'min ha'etz achalta?' (quoting the verse (whose first word is spelled the same way in Hebrew as 'Haman') in which God asks Adam, did you eat from the tree? Of course, Adam ate from the tree, which event marks the fracture of paradisiacal reality and relation and the beginning of dualistic, judgmental consciousness (separating between me and you, between mind and body, between us/world and God) and self-centered orientation (this is useful for me, that I don't want, etc). In Hasidut this theme is elaborated upon where Haman is understood as representing ego, or small-mindedness, or identity derived from external factors.

When we live from a place of ego, we are necessarily anxious, insecure, we feel separate from others and from the Divine, and most of our actions are unconsciously directed by the need either for approval or for the assertion of power over others, for when we are not aware enough to experience our inherent value and self-worth, we try and compensate by controlling others. We try and fill the inner void by amassing wealth or power, trying to increase our status in the eyes of others, as if we can make up for our own lack of confidence by commanding the respect of others. Haman's vitriolic antagonism towards Mordechai shows how well that works. It is the quintessential example of the Baal Shem Tov's mashal hamarah* (parable of the mirror), the idea that the way we see others is actually a reflection of ourselves, or of our perspective. After all, Mordechai is just sitting. In fact, he has been doing good, saving the king's life and whatnot. What kind of an orientation leads us to be jealous of those who are doing good?

The revelation of Purim (Megillat Esther can also be translated as 'the revelation of the hidden') is not exogenous. It is the illumination that happens when we let go of ego, when we move from mochin d'katnut to mochin d'gadlut, from the small-minded, constricted egocentrism to the expanded consciousness where compassion and connectedness characterize our lives. The sages said that there are only two things that keep us from tikkun olam b'malchut Sha-ddai (the Kingdom of God), the overcoming of one of which- shiabud l'malchut (or enslavement to a foreign power), we celebrate on Purim. If the case is as above, then the only thing keeping Us/Divine from paradise is, well, us. and the shift that must occur, the shift from Haman to Mordechai, is the shift from me to We.
Who knows, maybe it is for this that we are here?




*I dressed up this year as a mirror, so I was 'you'.

Monday, February 1, 2010

existential statistics/the statistics of wisdom

the statistics of wisdom
we're working on simple regressions in stat class, trying to fit a function to the data of a population. of course, often we can speak only theoretically about a perfect fit line- in reality, we deal with paramaters concluded from limited data, and a certain amount of 'disturbance' or 'noise' or 'randomness' which accounts for/causes the deviation of our data points from those that would occur/that our model would predict.

(to see a picture, go to http://rchsbowman.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/042809-2355-1.png)


It strikes me that this is a good metaphor for the way we mature and develop wisdom, defined as an understanding of how life works.
The two simple paramaters that we endeavor to determine are slope and intercept (in linear regression). Starting from the y-intercept the best slope attempts to run the closest path to the data points. I think as we go along life's path we make little adjustments in trying to navigate that best fit line; sometimes, however, perhaps after considering a new outlying data sample, we make radical changes, as if to change the intercept, change our whole point of departure. As we grow wiser, we decrease the significance of disturbance factors and internalize more parameters, ie determining factors. The result is gradual improvements and an occasional paradigm shift that models the data much more lucidly. Perhaps moments of greatest enlightenment represent a perfect understanding of all data points.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Getting past the authority vs autonomy dichotomy

i realized that i can post things which are short, instead of just keeping them on my 'blog ideas' page, so here's a thought:

"Our generation has a hard time with authority. In some ways it’s a healthy response to religious authoritarianism, but now we find ourselves in a postmodern age where autonomy is the highest value, and we’re struggling to articulate what could possibly be the nature of an obligation. What could possibly ground a Jewish life?"-R' David Ingber

P.eople and authority both emanate from God. I think that the apprehension towards authority is the feeling of imposition. Who is someone else to eclipse me in the authorship of my own life? It is a feeling of imposition, a compromise of our authenticity. Until we have an experience when the 'I' that's been feeling imposed upon gives way and experiences its groundedness in something deeper and more authentic; then the 'I' (ego) that was feeling compromised becomes the one that is imposing, distracting, inauthentic, and we subscribe to (ie 'write under') the deeper Source in which we're grounded, allowing it, as any inspired writer will tell you, to write through us. Some of us know this to be God, the Divine Whence. What was grounded has been revealed to be illusion, groundless, giving way to a rootedness in and beyond the Ground of All Being, which we permit to flow freely through us; Which commands in a way that, far from being imposing, is the very wellspring of authenticity. This is the ohl malchut shamayim, the Divine yoke- not a yoke of oppression, but like its root meaning 'to join,' or in modern terms, 'to plug in.'
לייחד שמך באהבה,
יחוד קודש–א בריך הוא ושכינתיה